vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
It is a reminder that your game’s security is only as strong as the laziest line of memory allocation.
The MrAntiFun trainer became a case study in . Modern game developers (Riot, Blizzard, Bungie) learned from MW2’s failure. You cannot trust the player’s RAM. You cannot trust the player’s executable. That is why we have kernel-level anti-cheats (Vanguard, Faceit) and server-authoritative netcode today. call of duty modern warfare 2 trainer mrantifun
Enter MrAntiFun. Unlike cheat codes of the Doom or GoldenEye era, MW2 had no console. MrAntiFun’s trainer was a third-party executable that hooked into the game’s memory. It is a reminder that your game’s security
But the trainer didn't have a "kill switch" for multiplayer. It was a loaded gun left on the coffee table. The developer didn't pull the trigger, but he didn't safety-lock it, either. Why does this matter in 2025? You cannot trust the player’s RAM
It is a reminder that your game’s security is only as strong as the laziest line of memory allocation.
The MrAntiFun trainer became a case study in . Modern game developers (Riot, Blizzard, Bungie) learned from MW2’s failure. You cannot trust the player’s RAM. You cannot trust the player’s executable. That is why we have kernel-level anti-cheats (Vanguard, Faceit) and server-authoritative netcode today.
Enter MrAntiFun. Unlike cheat codes of the Doom or GoldenEye era, MW2 had no console. MrAntiFun’s trainer was a third-party executable that hooked into the game’s memory.
But the trainer didn't have a "kill switch" for multiplayer. It was a loaded gun left on the coffee table. The developer didn't pull the trigger, but he didn't safety-lock it, either. Why does this matter in 2025?