Sign Up
Subscribe today to get The Marjorie’s in-depth environmental journalism and storytelling delivered directly to your inbox.
Subscribe today to get The Marjorie’s in-depth environmental journalism and storytelling delivered directly to your inbox.
Thank you for registering!
An account was already registered with this email.
Please check your inbox for an authentication link.
It also demonstrates the role of Singapore’s courts in interpreting the Constitution to limit governmental power—not to control politics, but to ensure that constitutional duties are exercised in good faith. Vellama stands for the proposition that while the Prime Minister has discretion over the timing of a by-election, there is a legal duty to call one within a reasonable time. Absolute refusal or indefinite delay is unconstitutional. If you ever hear someone say, “The government must call a by-election because of Vellama ,” they are partly right—but with the crucial nuance that “reasonable time” is context-dependent and ultimately a political, not judicial, call. Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific legal questions, consult a qualified lawyer.
Published by: Legal & Public Affairs Desk vellama
If you follow Singapore politics or law, you may have heard the name Vellama mentioned in discussions about by-elections and the powers of the Prime Minister. But what exactly happened in this case, and why is it considered a landmark ruling? It also demonstrates the role of Singapore’s courts
However, after the Hougang vacancy, the Prime Minister stated that there was no need to call a by-election immediately, citing that the government still had a working majority. A second vacancy soon occurred in another SMC (Punggol East). If you ever hear someone say, “The government
It also demonstrates the role of Singapore’s courts in interpreting the Constitution to limit governmental power—not to control politics, but to ensure that constitutional duties are exercised in good faith. Vellama stands for the proposition that while the Prime Minister has discretion over the timing of a by-election, there is a legal duty to call one within a reasonable time. Absolute refusal or indefinite delay is unconstitutional. If you ever hear someone say, “The government must call a by-election because of Vellama ,” they are partly right—but with the crucial nuance that “reasonable time” is context-dependent and ultimately a political, not judicial, call. Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific legal questions, consult a qualified lawyer.
Published by: Legal & Public Affairs Desk
If you follow Singapore politics or law, you may have heard the name Vellama mentioned in discussions about by-elections and the powers of the Prime Minister. But what exactly happened in this case, and why is it considered a landmark ruling?
However, after the Hougang vacancy, the Prime Minister stated that there was no need to call a by-election immediately, citing that the government still had a working majority. A second vacancy soon occurred in another SMC (Punggol East).